Some of my friends and I were still excitedly comparing thoughts on Monday's amazing Boston marathon, when news came of the death of one of the greatest runners ever. I was deeply saddened to learn that Grete Waitz had lost her 6 year battle with cancer, and died in a hospital in Oslo, Norway tuesday. She was just 57 years old.
Her running resume is too vast to detail. She was a world record holder several times over, an Olympic medal winner, and won the New York marathon a mind-boggling 9 times. Many credit her as the pioneer who really opened up the sport of distance running to women. Perhaps the most difficult New York marathon she ran however was, by far, her slowest. And most memorable. She ran it in 5:32, in 1992, with her friend, New York marathon founder Fred Lebow. Lebow
was suffering from brain cancer that would claim his life two years later. Waitz said it was very difficult to run that race not only because of the emotional aspect, but it was tough to be on the course so long for someone used to running in less than half that time. She meant that, in part, as a tribute to the vast majority of runners who are not as physically gifted and generally finish in the middle and back of the pack.
Some time later, I was fortunate enough to get the chance to interview her a couple times when she was in Chicago to promote the Chase Corporate Challenge race series. She was one of the most humble, down-to-earth women I've ever met. You would never guess she was a living legend in the running world. We chatted about lots of things, but one thing taht was clear is that she was genuinely interested in promoting the sport for women. She was especially proud of the race she started in Norway that draws tens of thousands of women every year.
She promised to send me a copy of the book she was working on at the time. When it was finished, she did send it, with a nice note inside that I proudly treasure to this day. I am in good company with so many others who had the chance to meet and talk to this amazing woman. I ran accross a nice piece by Amby Burfoot of Runner's World that illustrates that point. Here's the link: http://footloose.runnersworld.com/2011/04/remembering-grete-waitz.html
Lots of people have noted the irony that Waitz died one day after the most amazing Boston marathon in the long history of that race. To think that two runners shattered the world record by a mind-blowing margin (nearly a minute), and the top American, Ryan Hall, was under the U.S. record by more than two min
utes (and only managed 4th place) is simply beyond hyperbole.
I know it doesn't count as a world record because of the overall drop in elevation and the fact that it's a point-to-point course with the finish so far from the start. But anyone who has run Boston before knows that the elevation changes are hardly an advantage. The downhill portions beat you up, and they are more than equalized by the 'Newton Hills', most notably 'Heartbreak Hill'.
Geoffrey Mutai's effort for now counts merely as the course record. He reportedly wants it to count as the World Record, recognized by the IAAF, and the Boston Marathon organizers are apparently going to appeal on his behalf. Part of the reason a point to point course doesn't count for records is because of the possibility of having a tail wind for the entire race. That was the case in Boston Monday. There was a 20 mile an hour wind at their backs helping them along. But I maintain that the rolling hills there are still so challenging that the wind, while helpful, shouldn't nullify the significance of the time.
And there is one more important point worth noting. Boston is an 'honest' race. There are no rabbits, or pacers to help pull the leaders through in certain splits. Most other major marathons, including Chicago, use rabbits. When Haile Gebrselassie set the world record of 2:03:59 a couple years ago in Berlin, he was aided by three pacers. It was every man for himself Monday in Boston.
A few years ago there was a lot of speculation in the running community that man had just about hit his limit as far as world records in the marathon. Noone could imagine going under 2:07. Then 2:05. Now they have very nearly gone under 2:03! That's a pace of 4:42 per mile, only about 25 seconds or so slower than my fastest single mile in my college track days. But they're keeping that pace for 26 miles. I couldn't have kept it for another 100 meters. It is just crazy.
It's also inspiring. More than a few runners I know who were not in Boston this year mentioned they started thinking about how fun it would be to go after witnessing this year's race. Of course, the conditons this year were just about perfect, and the odds of getting another day like that are pretty slim.
Regardless, it's great to see such amazing feats in running, and it will undoubtedly give us something to talk about while we slog through the miles on our weekend long runs. At a much more pedestrian pace.
See you on the roads.....